Carter v. Wade et al
| Angela Carter |
| Sheriff Michael L. Wade and Deputy David L. Watkins |
| 3:2021cv00445 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Angela Carter of Rule 26(f) Conference (Carroll, Seth) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Pretrial Conference reset for 10/12/2021 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (rpiz) |
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER with Attachment #1 Pretrial Schedule A - Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/7/2021 at 9:30 AM before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Order issued by deputy clerk at the direction of the Court) (rpiz)
|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Michael L. Wade.(Etherington, William) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by David L. Watkins.(Tunner, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William Woodul Tunner on behalf of David L. Watkins (Tunner, William) |
|
Filing 11
CONSENT ORDER - COME NOW the parties, by agreement, and ask for and consent to extend the deadline for Defendants Sheriff Michael L. Wade and Deputy David L. Watkins to file their Answers and/or other responsive pleadings on or before August 19, 2021; and therefore it is ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED that the deadline for Defendants Sheriff Wade and Deputy Watkins to file their Answers and/or other responsive pleadings is extended until on or before August 19, 2021. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 8/3/2021. (smej, )
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and/or Responsive Pleadings by Michael L. Wade. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Order Granting Extension)(Etherington, William) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Greer Quinlan Drummond on behalf of Michael L. Wade (Drummond, Greer) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Neal Jamerson on behalf of Michael L. Wade (Jamerson, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William Fisher Etherington on behalf of Michael L. Wade (Etherington, William) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Angela Carter Michael L. Wade served on 7/16/2021, answer due 8/6/2021 (Carroll, Seth) Modified to correct service date and answer due date on 7/26/2021 (smej, ). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Angela Carter David L. Watkins served on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021 (Carroll, Seth) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Michael L. Wade, David L. Watkins. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #2 Proposed Summons: The filing user is notified that the documents were incorrectly saved PDF fillable forms and have been corrected by the Clerk. (smej, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Deputy David L. Watkins by Angela Carter. (Carroll, Seth) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons for Sheriff Michael L. Wade by Angela Carter. (Carroll, Seth) (Main Document 2 replaced on 7/14/2021) (smej, ). |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7885358.), filed by Angela Carter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carroll, Seth) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (adun, ) |
| Filing attorney reminded to file proposed summons.(adun, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
