David v. Smith
Naitraj David |
Gerald M. Smith |
3:2021cv00465 |
July 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John A Gibney |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Gerald M. Smith. Clerk mailed to pro se plaintiff with copy of Rule 4. (smej, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gerald M. Smith (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: 34683051018), filed by Naitraj David. (Attachments: #1 Factual Allegations, #2 Receipt) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: David v. Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Naitraj David | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Gerald M. Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.