Emrit v. PNC Bank
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| PNC Bank |
| 3:2021cv00512 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE RECEIVED entitled "AALS 2021-2022 Faculty Appointments Register Form" by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachment: #1 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification). (sbea,) |
| USCA Case Number 21-1910 USCA, REdwards, Case Manager for #2 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT filed by Ronald Satish Emrit against PNC Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope). (sbea,) |
Filing 4
ORDER that Emrit appears qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, therefore, the Motion is provisionally GRANTED. Emrit is to file with the Court the Ghostwriting Form, (a copy of which is enclosed), no later than October 1, 2021. Failure to comply with this request will result in the case being dismissed without prejudice. The Court hereby ORDERS that the Clerk shall provisionally file the proffered Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that, no later than October 1, 2021, Emrit shall file an Amended Complaint, with a Ghostwriting Form attached, which outlines in simple and straightforward terms why Emrit thinks that he is entitled to relief and why the Court has jurisdiction over his case. Emrit is ADVISED that the failure to strictly comply with the Courts directives and with applicable rules will result in DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. See Order for details. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 831, #2 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification). Order was mailed to plaintiff. (sbea,) Modified on 8/20/2021 (sbea,)
|
| Filing 3 Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #2 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal (All case opening forms, plus the transcript guidelines, may be obtained from the Fourth Circuit's website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov) (tjoh, ) |
| Assembled INITIAL Electronic Record Transmitted to 4CCA re #2 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachment: #1 Letter From Division of Elections). Filing fee was not received. (sbea,) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (Received), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(adun, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Emrit v. PNC Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PNC Bank | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
