Riddick v. Justice et al
| Rashad M. Riddick |
| Brandi Justice |
| 3:2021cv00623 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| David J Novak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER (Dismissing Case) - This matter comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Rashad M. Riddick' s ("Plaintiff") proposed Complaint. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion (ECF No. #4 ) accompanying this Order, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court hereby DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs Complaint as to Defendants Justice and Land and the 2021 Seclusion claim. Additionally, the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Complaint as to Defendants Vauter, Barber and Melton. This case is now CLOSED. Furthermore, the Court certifies that an appeal in forma pauperis would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). The Court hereby notifies Plaintiff that should he wish to appeal this Memorandum Opinion, written notice of the appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within the stated period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 11/15/2021. Copy of memorandum opinion and order mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Case). Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 11/15/2021. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification by Rashad M. Riddick re #2 Order. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER (Provisionally Granting IFP and Requiring Ghostwriting Form) that the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Leave to Proceed informa pauperis. the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to file with the Court the Ghostwriting Form, no later than October 26, 2021. To that end, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to enclose a copy of the Ghostwriting Form with this Order when it is forwarded to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is hereby ADVISED that, if he does not satisfy these requirements, theprovisional grant of relief to proceed in forma pauperis will be withdrawn and the Motion for Leave to Proceed informa pauperis will be denied. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/05/21. Copy of Order and Ghostwriting Form mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Brandi Justice, filed by Rashad M. Riddick. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(adun, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riddick v. Justice et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rashad M. Riddick | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brandi Justice | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
