Patterson v. Unknown
| Curtis Patterson |
| Unknown, Commonwealth of Virginia and Vincent L. Robertson |
| 3:2021cv00694 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Curtis Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(adun, )
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Requiring Petitioner to Complete the Standardized Form). The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the form and SEND the form to Petitioner. If Petitioner wishes to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must complete and return the form to the Court within 20 days of the date of entry hereof. In the alternative, Petitioner may file, within 20 days of the date of entry hereof, a motion to withdraw this action. If petitioner fails to take any action within that time, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 11/19/2021. Copy of Order and 2254 petition with civil action number on form mailed to Petitioner. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Curtis Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(adun, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
