Smith v. Williams
Plaintiff: Ralph Smith
Defendant: Detective Robert Williams and Robert Williams
Case Number: 3:2021cv00721
Filed: November 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: Henry E Hudson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Screening Action). It is ORDERED that: The action is FILED and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The institution where Plaintiff is confined will mail to the Court twenty percent (20%) of all of Plaintiff's deposits until the balance of $350.00 is paid. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Order to Plaintiff. A copy of this Memorandum Order and Plaintiff's consent to collection of fees form shall be sent to the accounting department at Plaintiff's place of incarceration. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 1/13/2022. Memorandum Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Southside Regional Jail as to Ralph Smith. (sbea)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Consent to Collection of Fees by Ralph Smith. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 11/24/2021. Memorandum Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER COMPLAINT filed by Ralph Smith against Robert Williams. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope). (sbea)
November 18, 2021 Opinion or Order CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Ralph Smith. (sbea)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ralph Smith. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Robert Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?