Erby et al v. Benchmark Community Bank
Plaintiff: Mary Erby and Gordon Erby
Defendant: Benchmark Community Bank
Case Number: 3:2021cv00751
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Henry E Hudson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2022 Filing 6 FINAL ORDER. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice (ECF No. #5 ), filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). It appearing to this Court that all matters of controversy have been fully resolved and compromised, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court, however, shall retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994). It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 1/12/2022. (sbea)
January 11, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE Of Dismissal With Prejudice As To Benchmark Community Bank by Gordon Erby and Mary Erby (McNichol, James). Modified docket text on 1/12/2022. (sbea)
December 8, 2021 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Mary Erby, Gordon Erby. Benchmark Community Bank waiver sent on 12/8/2021, answer due 2/7/2022. (Kelly, Kristi)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Benchmark Community Bank, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (jpow, )
December 3, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Gordon Erby, Mary Erby. (Kelly, Kristi)
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8135559.), filed by Mary Erby, Gordon Erby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelly, Kristi)
December 3, 2021 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jpow, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erby et al v. Benchmark Community Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Erby
Represented By: Kristi Cahoon Kelly
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Guzzo
Represented By: Casey Shannon Nash
Represented By: James Patrick McNichol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gordon Erby
Represented By: Kristi Cahoon Kelly
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Guzzo
Represented By: Casey Shannon Nash
Represented By: James Patrick McNichol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benchmark Community Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?