Mergenthaler v. GEO Group et al
| Devin T. Mergenthaler |
| GEO Group, Dr. I. Esochaghi and Lawrenceville Correctional Center |
| 3:2021cv00812 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| David J Novak |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Directing Clerk to Mail 1983 Form). Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has submitted a letter requesting an update on the status of a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint that he maintains he submitted to the Court on or around November 15, 2021, (ECF No. #1 ). The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the standardized form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint and to send the form to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff wishes to file a complaint, he should complete and return the provided form to the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry hereof. If Plaintiff fails to respond within that time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 1/12/2022. Memorandum Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against I. Esochaghi, GEO Group, Lawrenceville Correctional Center, filed by Devin T. Mergenthaler. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
