Lane v. Monsanto Company
| David Lane |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2022cv00074 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remarks- DETAILS: Case transferred from Virginia Eastern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:22-cv-01022, filed 02/18/2022. (adun, ) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-315). (adun, ) |
| Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-315) - 1 action(s) re: pldg. ( 2629 in MDL No. 2741, 1 in VAE/3:22-cv-00074) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 2/17/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 2741, VAE/3:22-cv-00074 (CMD) (adun, ) |
| ***TEXT ONLY ENTRY*** MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-315) Finalized on 2/17/22. Please see pleading ( 2641 in MDL No. 2741, 3 in VAE/3:22-cv-00074). As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the N.D. California for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 2/17/2022.Associated Cases: MDL No. 2741, VAE/3:22-cv-00074 (CMD) (adun, ) |
| Case electronically transferred to District of Northern California. (adun, ) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Monsanto Company. (Barago, Tamara) (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/4/2022) (adun, ). |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8230582.), filed by Monsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barago, Tamara) (Main Document 1 replaced on 2/4/2022) (adun, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/4/2022) (adun, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge David J. Novak. (adun, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lane v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Lane | |
| Represented By: | Drew David Sarrett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Tamara Fishman Barago |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
