Chase v. Wilson
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons / Warden
Petitioner: Richard J. Chase
Respondent: R. Wilson
Case Number: 3:2022cv00092
Filed: February 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: David J Novak
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action). This action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 4/12/2022. Memorandum Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Richard J. Chase. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 BIVENS COMPLAINT filed by Richard J. Chase against Federal Bureau of Prisons / Warden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unmarked, #2 Envelope). (sbea)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Richard J. Chase. (sbea)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Directing Clerk to Mail Bivens Form) - He must pursue a complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the standardized form for filing a Bivens complaint and to send the form to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff wishes to file a complaint at this time, he should complete and return the form to the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry hereof. If Plaintiff fails to take any action within that time, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 3/10/2022. Copy of memorandum order and Bivens form mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (jpow, )
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION filed by Richard J. Chase for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chase v. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard J. Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons / Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?