Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Pension Fund et al v. VEI Solutions, Inc.
Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Pension Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic States District Council Participating Locals' Annuity Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Apprenticeship Fund, Trustees of the Iron Workers Management Progressive Action Cooperative Trust Fund, Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Industry Advancement Fund, International Iron Workers Organizing Fund and Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 |
VEI Solutions, Inc. |
3:2022cv00125 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
David J Novak |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to VEI Solutions, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (smej, ) |
Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by International Iron Workers Organizing Fund, Iron Workers Local Union No. 28, Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Industry Advancement Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Apprenticeship Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Pension Fund, Trustees of the Iron Workers Management Progressive Action Cooperative Trust Fund, Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic District Council Participating Locals Annuity Fund. (Szewczyk, Jacob) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/4/2022) (smej, ). |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint,, by International Iron Workers Organizing Fund, Iron Workers Local Union No. 28, Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Industry Advancement Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Apprenticeship Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Pension Fund, Trustees of the Iron Workers Management Progressive Action Cooperative Trust Fund, Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic District Council Participating Locals Annuity Fund. (Szewczyk, Jacob) (Main Document 2 replaced on 3/4/2022) (smej, ). |
Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8274618), filed by Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Industry Advancement Fund, Iron Workers Local Union No. 28, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Pension Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Apprenticeship Fund, Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic District Council Participating Locals Annuity Fund, International Iron Workers Organizing Fund, Trustees of Iron Workers Local Union No. 28 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Iron Workers Management Progressive Action Cooperative Trust Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Service)(Szewczyk, Jacob) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/4/2022 to include civil action number) (smej, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/4/2022) (smej, ). |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge David J. Novak. (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.