Glenn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.
Jason D. Glenn |
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. |
3:2022cv00269 |
April 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Robert E Payne |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Jason D. Glenn. (Flores, Stephen) |
Filing 9 ORDER - Having reviewed the JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT (ECF No. #8 ) filed on May 25, 2022, and it appearing that the disputes in this action have been settled, it is hereby ORDERED that, by June 9, 2022, the parties shall electronically file a Stipulation of Dismissal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/2/2022. (jpow, ) |
Filing 8 Joint NOTICE of Settlement by Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. (Dickinson, Ian) Modified docket text on 5/27/2022 (jpow, ). |
Filing 7 ORDER Having considered DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.'S CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF No. #5 ), and there being no objection by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (ECF No. #5 ) is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by May 25, 2022. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 5/10/2022. (asho, ) |
Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.. (Dickinson, Ian) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Wells Fargo Bank, N. A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dickinson, Ian) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jason D. Glenn Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022 (Flores, Stephen) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (jpow, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Jason D. Glenn. (Flores, Stephen) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8352462.), filed by Jason D. Glenn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Flores, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Glenn v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jason D. Glenn | |
Represented By: | Stephen Leigh Flores |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. | |
Represented By: | Ian R. Dickinson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.