Saunders v. Miyares et al
Petitioner: Joseph Dale Saunders
Respondent: Jason S. Miyares and Harold W. Clarke
Case Number: 3:2022cv00341
Filed: April 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John A Gibney
Referring Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Joseph Dale Saunders. (sbea)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joseph Dale Saunders. (sbea)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Filing 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition and Requiring Petitioner to Complete the Standardized Form). Upon initial consideration of the petition, it is ORDERED that: The petition is CONDITIONALLY FILED; In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, all pro se petitions for writs of habeas corpora must be filed on a set of standardized forms. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Petitioner the standardized form for filing a 2254 petition. The Clerk shall WRITE the civil action number for the present action on the form. Petitioner is DIRECTED to complete and return the form to the Court within eleven (11) days of the date of entry hereof. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a Notice & Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate form. Petitioner should only return this form if Petitioner consents to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. If Petitioner so consents, Petitioner should return this form within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry hereof. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 5/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Notice and Consent). Memorandum Order and required forms were mailed to the petitioner. (sbea)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing Fee: $5 Receipt Number: 34683053459), filed by Joseph Dale Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum by a Person in State Custody, #2 Transcripts, #3 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification, #4 Receipt)(jpow, ). (Additional attachment added on 4/29/2022: #5 Service Address for Harold W. Clarke). Modified on 4/29/2022. (sbea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saunders v. Miyares et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph Dale Saunders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason S. Miyares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?