Renaut v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
| Julien M. Renaut |
| Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. |
| 3:2022cv00361 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A..(Lehnen, Katherine) |
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER. See for complete details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Nikki Brown with the permission of District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/29/2022. (Attachment: #1 Schedule A) (nbrow)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/20/2022 at 10:30 AM in Richmond Judges Chamber before District Judge Robert E. Payne. See for complete details. Issued at the direction of the Court. Signed by Nikki Brown with the permission of District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/29/2022. (nbrow)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Drew David Sarrett on behalf of Julien M. Renaut (Sarrett, Drew) |
|
Filing 9
ORDERED that the #7 CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by July 1, 2022. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Robert E. Payne on 6/2/2022. (sbea)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Lehnen, Katherine). Modified to correct docket text on 5/27/2022. (sbea) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lehnen, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Elizabeth Lehnen on behalf of Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Lehnen, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Alan Fratkin on behalf of Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Fratkin, Bryan) |
| Notice of Correction re: #8 Financial Disclosure Statement; Filing attorney selected the wrong event. The correct event would be "Corporate Disclosure Statement". Clerk will correct docket text to reflect same. No further action is required. (sbea) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julien M. Renaut Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. served on 5/11/2022, answer due 6/1/2022 (Bennett, Leonard) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (sbea) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. by M. Julien Renaut. (Bennett, Leonard) |
| Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8375787), filed by M. Julien Renaut. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bennett, Leonard). Modified on 5/4/2022. (sbea) |
| Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint; Clerk corrected Plaintiff's name on the Docket. The first and middle were transposed. No further action is required. (sbea) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (sbea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
