Edwards v. Roth
Michael J. Edwards, Sr. |
Carrie Roth |
3:2022cv00375 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John A Gibney |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by Carrie Roth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Adams, Rachel) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by Carrie Roth. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Adams, Rachel) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Willer Adams on behalf of Carrie Roth (Adams, Rachel) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by William Woodul Tunner on behalf of Carrie Roth (Tunner, William) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by William Daniel Prince, IV on behalf of Carrie Roth (Prince, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Carrie Roth served on 6/2/2022, answer due 6/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 USM Form) (smej, ) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Carrie Roth. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 Form) Placed in USM box for service.(jpow, ) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Carrie Roth, filed by Michael J. Edwards, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Wages, #2 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jpow, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER - The Court FINDS the plaintiff unable to pay the costs of proceeding in this case. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the plaintiffs motions. #1 #3 The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to docket the complaint, (ECF No. 1-1 ), and to issue summons upon the defendant. The Court DIRECTS the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant with the summons and a copy of the complaint. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 5/26/2022. Copy of order mailed to pro se plaintiff. (jpow, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael J. Edwards, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jpow, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER that the Court DIRECTS the plaintiff to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before June 6, 2022. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 5/16/2022. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff as directed with a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis (jsmi, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael J. Edwards, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint - Received, #2 Statement of Wages, #3 Local Rule 83.1) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Edwards v. Roth | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael J. Edwards, Sr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carrie Roth | |
Represented By: | Rachel Willer Adams |
Represented By: | William Daniel Prince, IV |
Represented By: | William Woodul Tunner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.