Jones v. American Honda Motor Company Incorporated
| Janay Jones |
| Noriya Kaihara Kaihara and American Honda Motor Company Incorporated |
| 3:2022cv00558 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Janay Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER that the plaintiff asks the Court to allow her to request admissions regarding "the business structure of American Honda Motor Company[,] Inc. and its United States subsidiaries and affiliates pertaining directly to the Acura Brand." (ECF No. 12, at 1.) The plaintiff's request is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 10/6/2022. Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Discovery Request for Admissions by Janay Jones. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1) (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Stadler on behalf of American Honda Motor Company Incorporated (Stadler, Lauren)
|
|
Notice of Correction: Lauren Stadler, listed as counsel for defendant (ECF No. 9 and 10) notified to update firm association in PACER and inform the clerk once complete to be added to the docket. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 10
Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by American Honda Motor Company Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Pak, Yoora)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by American Honda Motor Company Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Rosboro Notice, #2 Proposed Order)(Pak, Yoora)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Yoora Pak on behalf of American Honda Motor Company Incorporated (Pak, Yoora)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Janay Jones American Honda Motor Company Incorporated served on 8/30/2022, answer due 9/20/2022 (asho, )
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to American Honda Motor Company Incorporated. Clerk hand-delivered to Plaintiff with service instructions. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Returned Unexecuted by Janay Jones as to Norlya Kalhara, American Honda Motor Company Incorporated. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the prose plaintiffs motion for service. (ECF No. #3 .) Because the plaintiff does not proceed informa pauperis and presents no other good cause in support of her request, the Court DENIES the motion. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 8/26/2022. (A copy of this Order sent to Plaintiff) (asho, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to have USMS serve summons by Janay Jones. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Noriya Kaihara Kaihara. Summons, Complaint with attachments, and service instruction letter mailed to Plaintiff. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against American Honda Motor Company Incorporated ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 34683054372.), filed by Janay Jones. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 83.1 Certification, #8 Receipt, #9 Proposed Summons)(asho, ) Modified on 8/26/2022 (asho, ). (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/26/2022) (asho, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
