Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company v. Tanya Investments, LLC
| Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company |
| Tanya Investments, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00594 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Correction re #5 - Filing attorney notified that proper filing event for summons returned executed can be found under service of process. When the correct event is used, it will prompt an answer due date. Clerk has corrected docket entry and set answer deadline. No further action needed at this time. (adun, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Tanya Investments, LLC served on 09/28/2022, answer due 10/19/2022. (Montgomery, Diane) Modified docket text on 10/27/2022 (adun, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Tanya Investments, LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplex copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention. Electronically file the return using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (adun, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, to Defendant Tanya Investments, LLC by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. (Montgomery, Diane) |
| Filing attorney is instructed to file the proposed summons (on non-fillable form) to serve the defendant, or if waiving service, to notify the court in writing by electronically filing the notice. (jsmi, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. (Montgomery, Diane) |
| Filing 1 Complaint For Declaratory Judgment ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8552436.), filed by Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 2020-2021 Insurance Contract, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2021-2022 Insurance Contract, #3 Exhibit 3 - Underlying Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Montgomery, Diane) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/2/2022) (jsmi, ). (Attachment 4 replaced on 9/2/2022) (jsmi, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company v. Tanya Investments, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Diane U. Montgomery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tanya Investments, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
