Uhle v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Paul H. Uhle
Defendant: Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv00626
Filed: September 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert E Payne
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2022 Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) of the MDL Panel 3044. 29 action(s) re: pldg. (6 in ARE/4:22-cv-00772, 1 in ARE/4:22-cv-00890, 12 in CAC/2:22-cv-04106, 12 in CO/1:22-cv-01511, 6 in CT/3:22-cv-01072, 12 in INS/1:22-cv-01237, 9 in KYW/3:22-cv-00423, 3 in LAE/2:22-cv-03168, 1 in LAE/2:22-cv-03519, 1 in LAE/2:22-cv-03524, 11 in LAM/3:22-cv-00568, 8 in MD/1:22-cv-01846, 120 in MDL No. 3044, 11 in NJ/2:22-cv-05240, 10 in NJ/3:22-cv-04399, 11 in NJ/3:22-cv-04559, 7 in NYN/3:22-cv-00673, 6 in NYS/1:22-cv-05863, 6 in NYS/1:22-cv-05864, 3 in NYS/1:22-cv-07778, 1 in NYS/7:22-cv-08154, 6 in OHN/1:22-cv-01487, 7 in OHN/5:22-cv-01320, 12 in PAE/2:22-cv-02339, 10 in PAE/2:22-cv-02895, 7 in PAE/2:22-cv-03772, 5 in TXE/1:22-cv-00377, 10 in TXN/3:22-cv-01554, 1 in TXS/1:22-cv-00135, 2 in VAE/3:22-cv-00626) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 10/20/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044 et al. (TF) (smej, )
October 20, 2022 Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of New York per #5 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) of the MDL Panel 3044. Case Number in EDNY 1:22cv6084. (smej, ) Modified on 11/1/2022 (smej, ).
October 20, 2022 ***TEXT ONLY ENTRY*** MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) Finalized on 10/20/22. Please see pleading (8 in ARE/4:22-cv-00772, 3 in ARE/4:22-cv-00890, 14 in CAC/2:22-cv-04106, 14 in CO/1:22-cv-01511, 8 in CT/3:22-cv-01072, 14 in INS/1:22-cv-01237, 11 in KYW/3:22-cv-00423, 5 in LAE/2:22-cv-03168, 3 in LAE/2:22-cv-03519, 3 in LAE/2:22-cv-03524, 13 in LAM/3:22-cv-00568, 10 in MD/1:22-cv-01846, 127 in MDL No. 3044, 13 in NJ/2:22- cv-05240, 12 in NJ/3:22-cv-04399, 13 in NJ/3:22-cv-04559, 9 in NYN/3:22- cv-00673, 8 in NYS/1:22-cv-05863, 8 in NYS/1:22-cv-05864, 5 in NYS/1:22- cv-07778, 3 in NYS/7:22-cv-08154, 8 in OHN/1:22-cv-01487, 9 in OHN/5:22- cv-01320, 14 in PAE/2:22-cv-02339, 12 in PAE/2:22-cv-02895, 9 in PAE/2:22- cv-03772, 7 in TXE/1:22-cv-00377, 12 in TXN/3:22-cv-01554, 3 in TXS/1:22- cv-00135, 4 in VAE/3:22-cv-00626). As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the E.D. New York for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 10/20/2022. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3044 et al. (TF) (smej, )
September 20, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Exactech U.S., Inc., Exactech, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (smej, )
September 20, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint to Exactech U.S., Inc. by Paul H. Uhle. (Hart, Jason) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/20/2022) (smej, ).
September 20, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint to Exactech, Inc. by Paul H. Uhle. (Hart, Jason) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/20/2022) (smej, ).
September 20, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8577984), filed by Paul H. Uhle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hart, Jason) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/20/2022) (smej, ).
September 20, 2022 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (smej, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Uhle v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul H. Uhle
Represented By: Jason Matthew Hart
Represented By: Joel Dean Bieber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech U.S., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?