Allen v. Newton et al
Derrick Allen |
M. L. Newton, Hanover Sheriff Dept., Steve Trivett, Joshua Farrar and Doug Goodman |
3:2022cv00645 |
September 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Derrick Allen. (smej, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Derrick Allen. (smej, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER (Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) - THIS MATTER is before the Court on Derrick Allen's ("Plaintiff') pro se Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP"), filed on September 29, 2022 (ECF No. 1). While Plaintiff provides some information regarding his income on his IFP, Plaintiff filed the short form application and did not provide all the necessary information. Thus, the Court cannot adequately assess his ability to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/12/2022. (IFP long form and Order mailed to plaintiff) (smej, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Short form application) by Derrick Allen. (Attachments: #1 Complaint - Received, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.