Dandridge v. United States of America
| Victor M. Dandridge, III |
| United States of America |
| 3:2022cv00647 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Serving 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition) - It is ORDERED that: The petition shall be FILED; Respondent shall file a responsive pleading within sixty (60) days of the receipt of this Memorandum Order; Petitioner must immediately advise the Court of his new address in the event he is transferred, released, or otherwise relocated while the action is pending. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION; and Service shall be made upon Respondent by electronically transmitting a copy of this Memorandum Order and the petition, to the United States Attorney for this District and to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 10/4/2022. Copy of memorandum order mailed to Plaintiff. Copy of memorandum order and the petition electronically transmitted to the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia and to the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 11
Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:22-cv-00249. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2022: #2 Prisoner Data Sheet) (jlan, ).
|
|
Notification of transfer of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:22-cv-00249 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (jlan)
|
|
Filing 10
Order transferring case to Eastern District of Virginia and denying #7 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 9/28/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 9
Roseboro Notice re #7 MOTION to Dismiss . (Notice mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) (Main Document 9 replaced on 9/2/2022) (aab). Modified on 9/2/2022, (aab).Replaced deficient pdf document with corrected pdf document [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 8
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by United States of America. (Lugar, Justin) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss by United States of America. (Lugar, Justin) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 6
Supplemental Information in Support re #1 Petition filed by Victor M. Dandridge, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Cover Letter)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 5
Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2241 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Victor M. Dandridge, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 7/18/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing Fee Received $ 5.00, receipt number 7-72611 (aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 4
Supplemental Brief/Memorandum in Support (NOT SIGNED) re #1 Petition filed by Victor M. Dandridge, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A & B)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Change of Address by Victor M. Dandridge, III: 249 Bayberry Lane Gordonsville, Virginia 22942. (aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC 2241; Regarding Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis OR Pay the $5.00 Filing Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 21 days. Responses due by 7/11/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 6/17/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Victor M. Dandridge, III. (NOTE: BOP.Gov has Mr. Dandridge located at: RRM Raleigh, Old NC 75 Highway, Butner, NC 27509) (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Cover Letter) #3 Envelope) (tvt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 10/2/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dandridge v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Victor M. Dandridge, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | JUSTIN MICHAEL LUGAR |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
