Ambrose v. Unknown
| Michael Wayne Ambrose |
| Unknown |
| 3:2022cv00672 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| John A Gibney |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
FINAL ORDER. it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Petitioner failed to return the standardized form for filing a 28 U.S.C. petition; and, 2) A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Petitioner desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 12/7/2022. Memorandum Opinion and Final Order were mailed to the petitioner. (sbea)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by Senior United States District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 12/7/2022. (sbea)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Mason D. Williams on behalf of Unknown (Williams, Mason)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Directing Petitioner to Complete and Return Form). If Petitioner wishes to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the proper form. The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the form and SEND the form to Petitioner. If Petitioner wishes to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must complete and return the form to the Court within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof. In the alternative, Petitioner may file, within twenty (20) days of the date of entry hereof, a motion to withdraw this action. If Petitioner fails to take any action within that time, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 10/31/2022. Memorandum Order and 2254 were mailed to the petitioner. (Attachments: #1 2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus). (sbea)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Wayne Ambrose.(Attachments: #1 Facility Request, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope). (sbea)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Wayne Ambrose. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). (sbea)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ambrose v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Wayne Ambrose | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Unknown | |
| Represented By: | Mason D. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
