Keeton v. Schupp
| Allen Ray Keeton |
| Unknown and J. Shupp |
| 3:2022cv00723 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Prisoner COMPLAINT against J. Shupp, filed by Allen Ray Keeton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(adun, ) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER- The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the standardized form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint and to send the form to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff wishes to file a complaint at this time, he should complete and return the form to the Court within 30 days of the date of entry hereof. Plaintiff's request for the waiver of fees #1 and his request for the appointment of counsel #2 are premature and will be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 12/9/2022. Copy of Order and 1983 form mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(adun, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Allen Ray Keeton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjones, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Allen Ray Keeton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jjones, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
