Hutchins v. Federal Bar Associations et al
| Barry Hutchins |
| Federal Bar Associations, American Bar Associations, Office of the Bar Council of Lawyers Referrals, Trials Insurance Lawyers, Criminal Civil Rights Lawyers, Justice Department, Department of Corrections, Attorney General's Office, Governers Offices, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Supreme Courts General Jury Assembly, Judges Bar Associations, State Police Offices, Arlington Police Department, Richmond Police Department, John G. Adams, Beth Arthur, U.S. Attorney - Richmond, Office of Public Defenders, Office of Human Rights and Disabilities Insurance Agencies |
| 3:2022cv00787 |
| December 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER (Dismissing Action for Failure to Prosecute) that the Court hereby DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) for failure to prosecute. This case is now CLOSED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 1/9/2023. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER (Denying Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Ordering Particularized Complaint) The Court finds that Plaintiff failed to complete the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and, therefore, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ). The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to refile an amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, or to pay the filing fee. The Court has reviewed the Complaint and finds that it does not satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, it is hereby ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a particularized amended complaint that outlines in simple and straightforward terms why Plaintiff thinks that he is entitled to relief and why the Court has jurisdiction over this case. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 12/16/2022. (A copy of this Order, IFP and Pro Se Complaint form sent to Plaintiff at his address of record.) (asho, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Barry Hutchins. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (RECEIVED))(asho, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
