Woods v. Unknown
| Lorne Woods, Jr. |
| Unknown |
| 3:2023cv00004 |
| January 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT in a civil case- IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant, Unknown. Signed by Clerk on 2/27/2023. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff)(adun, )
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM ORDER- The request to withdraw any habeas petition #3 is GRANTED; the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a final appealable Judgment in a Civil Case in favor of Respondent as a separate entry on the docket. Petitioner does not request, and the Court does not grant, leave to amend, rendering this order final and appealable. Should Petitioner desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within 30 days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 2/27/2023. Copy of Opinion and Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 2/27/2023. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 4
Letter from Lorne Woods Jr. (Attachments: #1 unmarked attachments, #2 Envelope)(adun, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Withdraw #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) by Lorne Woods, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, )
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER- If Petitioner wishes to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the proper form. The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the form and SEND the form to Petitioner. If Petitioner wishes to proceed under 28 U.S.C. 2254, he must complete and return the form to the Court within 20 days of the date of entry hereof. In the alternative, Petitioner may file, within 20 days of the date of entry hereof, a motion to withdraw this action. If Petitioner fails to take any action within that time, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 1/13/2023. Copy of Order and 2254 form mailed to Petitioner as directed.(adun, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Lorne Woods, Jr. (Attachments: #1 ad Subjiciendum, #2 unmarked attachments, #3 Envelope, #4 Cover Letter)(adun, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woods v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lorne Woods, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
