Hill v. Equifax Information Services, Inc. et al
Bruce L. Hill |
Equifax Information Services, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC and Verizon Communications, Inc. |
3:2023cv00140 |
February 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Robert E Payne |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER that having considered DEFENDANT VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC.'S (erroneously sued as "VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.") CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF No. 18), and there being no objection by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (ECF No. #18 ) is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Verizon, shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by May 12, 2023. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 4/18/23. (jenjones, ) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint by Trans Union, LLC.(Wright, Gibson) |
Filing 18 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Verizon Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Johnathan) |
Filing 17 ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Experian's Consent Motion for an Extension of Time #15 be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and it is further, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., shall be GRANTED an extension of time until on or before April 28, 2023, to file its responsive pleadings, including its Answer, to the Complaint filed by Bruce L. Hill. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/22/23. (jenjones, ) |
Filing 16 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Anthony, David) |
Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anthony, David) |
Filing 14 ORDER that the MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #12 is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Trans Union LLC, shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by April 20, 2023. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/21/23. (jenjones, ) |
Filing 13 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Trans Union, LLC. (Wright, Gibson) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Trans Union, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Gibson) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bruce L. Hill Equifax Information Services, Inc. served on 2/28/2023, answer due 5/5/2023; Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 3/8/2023, answer due 3/29/2023; Trans Union, LLC served on 2/28/2023, answer due 3/21/2023; Verizon Communications, Inc. served on 2/28/2023, answer due 3/21/2023 (Kelly, Kristi) |
Filing 10 ORDER that the Motion for Extension of Time #8 is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendant, Equifax Information Services LLC, shall file its Answer and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by May 5, 2023. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/16/23. (jenjones, ) |
Filing 9 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Equifax Information Services, Inc.. (Montgomery, John) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Equifax Information Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Montgomery, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by James Patrick McNichol on behalf of Bruce L. Hill (McNichol, James) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Casey Shannon Nash on behalf of Bruce L. Hill (Nash, Casey) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Joseph Guzzo on behalf of Bruce L. Hill (Guzzo, Andrew) |
Filing 4 ORDER that the undersigned RECUSES himself from presiding over this case. Accordingly, the Clerk is ORDERED to REASSIGN this case to another United States District Judge in accordance with the Clerk's standard assignment procedure. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 2/24/23. (jenjones, ) |
Case Reassigned to District Judge Robert E. Payne. District Judge Henry E. Hudson no longer assigned to the case. (adun, ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, and Verizon Communications, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplex copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention. Electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (jenjones, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 2/23/2023) (jenjones, ). |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Bruce L. Hill. (Kelly, Kristi) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8816328.), filed by Bruce L. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelly, Kristi) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/23/2023) (jenjones, ). |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jenjones, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.