Newton v. Breckon, et al
Earl Nicholas Newton |
Unknown, Michael Breckon, Crystal Williams, Officer Mason and John Doe |
3:2023cv00148 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Mark R Colombell |
M Hannah Lauck |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DECLINE CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Earl Nicholas Newton. (jpow, ) |
Filing 4 PLRA Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 300001054. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Michael Breckon, Officer Mason, and Crystal Williams filed by Earl Nicholas Newton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(jsmi, ) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the standardized form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint and to send the form to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff wishes to file a complaint at this time, he should complete and return the form to the Court within 30 days of the date of entry hereof. If Plaintiff fails to take any action within that time, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 3/10/2023. Copy to Plaintiff with 1983 form as directed. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Unknown filed by Earl Nicholas Newton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.