Sam v. Kijakazi
Terrence Jemelle Sam |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice |
3:2023cv00151 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Mark R Colombell |
M Hannah Lauck |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 7/1/2021. (sbea) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 7/1/2021. (sbea) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. And it is SO ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 6/30/2021. (sbea) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Tyler Lucier on behalf of SSA (Social Security Administration) (Lucier, Jonathan). Modified on 3/3/2023. (sbea) |
Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8825412), filed by Terrence Jemelle Sam. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Henter, Charles). Modified on 3/1/2023. (sbea) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (sbea) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell. (sbea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.