Robinson v. City of Richmond, et al.
| Clayton Robinson |
| Tori Cotman, Jason Hudson, Jannifer Bell, City of Richmond, Richmond Police Department and Dept. of Child Support Enforcement |
| 3:2023cv00161 |
| March 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Roderick C Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
DISMISSAL ORDER - The Court gave Plaintiff leave to Amend rather than dismissing the action outright, (ECF No. #2 ). Unfortunately, while the present Amended Complaint corrects some of those issues, Plaintiff did not address all the problems the Court identified, and accordingly the Court finds that once again, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted. In light of the foregoing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court ORDERS that the action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 4/13/2023. Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Clayton Robinson against the City of Richmond, the Dept. of Child Support Enforcement, and the Richmond Police Department. (Attachment: #1 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification). (sbea) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Clayton Robinson against the City of Richmond, the Dept. of Child Support Enforcement, and the Richmond Police Department. (Attachment: #1 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification). (sbea) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Based on the financial information contained in Plaintiff's IFP Application, the Court is satisfied that Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status. Accordingly, Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. #1 , is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. However, Plaintiff's Complaint suffers from defects that must be addressed before this action may proceed, as they impact the Court's ability to hear this case. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed by filing an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to Show Cause. The Amended Complaint will supersede the initial Complaint and will become the operative complaint in this action. Plaintiff is ADVISED that this action may be dismissed if he fails to comply with the termsof this Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is further reminded that, although he initiated this matter pro se, he has the option of retaining counsel to assist him with the pursuit of his claims. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 3/23/2023. Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (incorrect signature date) by Clayton Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification). (sbea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
