Lucas v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
| Despina Neuph Lucas doing business as All Things |
| Commonwealth of Virginia, City of Hampton, Virginia, United States of America, Shawn Christopher Pfarner, Performance Food Group, Larry King Law, Rider Logistics & Transportation and Unknown |
| 3:2023cv00336 |
| May 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER (Dismissing Case for Failure to Comply with Court Orders and Failure to Prosecute) - This matter comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Despina Neuph Lucas' Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1), proposed Complaint, (ECF No. 1-1), and letter, dated May 31, 2023, (ECF No. 4), to the Court's Order (ECF. No. 2) directing Plaintiff to file a particularized amended complaint. Because Plaintiff has failed to file a particularized amended complaint and appears to have abandoned her suit, the Court hereby DISMISSES this action without prejudice. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 6/27/2023. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (smej, )
|
| Filing 4 Response to #2 Order, filed by Despina Neuph Lucas. (smej, ) |
| Filing 3 Additional Documents re ECF [1-1] Complaint by Despina Neuph Lucas. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER (Denying Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Directing Clerk to Mail Long Form, and Ordering Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint) - This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 1), and proposed Complaint, (ECF No. 1-1). Upon review of Plaintiff's Application, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has submitted the incorrect form. The Court thus DENIES the Application and DIRECTS the Clerk's Office to mail Plaintiff a copy of the Long Form version of the Application. The Court further DIRECTS that Plaintiff shall complete and return the correct Long Form within thirty (30) days of the entry hereof. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the action. the Court hereby DIRECTS that, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a particularized amended complaint that outlines in simple and straightforward terms why Plaintiff believes that she is entitled to relief and why the Court has jurisdiction over this case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(1) and (2). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 5/23/2023. (Long IFP form, Ghostwriting form and copy of Order mailed to plaintiff) (smej, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Despina Neuph Lucas. (Attachments: #1 Complaint - Received, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
