Harris v. Martin et al
| Antoine Eugene Harris |
| Nurse Martin, Judge Vaughan, Turnner, Lt. Shaw and Mr. Walker |
| 3:2023cv00344 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| Roderick C Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Antoine Eugene Harris. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Non-Prisoner Action)- The Clerk is DIRECTED to CONDITIONALLY docket this action. Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof. The Court is forwarding to Plaintiff the non-prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit for compliance. Failure to complete the affidavit in its entirety will result in summary dismissal of the action. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 6/15/2023. Copy of Order and non-prisoner IFP mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antoine Eugene Harris. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Nurse Martin, Shaw, Turnner, Judge Vaughan, and Walker filed by Antoine Eugene Harris. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jsmi, )
|
|
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Antoine Eugene Harris. (jsmi, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
