Brindock v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al.
| Loretta Brindock |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart #1833 and John Doe |
| 3:2023cv00372 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER (Settlement Conference Referral) that the settlement conference and proceedings required by section I(E)(1) of Pretrial Schedule A are referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell. Counsel shall be responsible for contacting the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Colombell within 5 days of the date of this Order to schedule the conference, which should occur at least 30 days before the start of trial and at such time as Magistrate Judge Colombell shall approve. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 8/3/2023. (jenjones, )
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL PRETRIAL ORDER - Jury Trial set for 2/27/2024 at 9:30 AM in Richmond Courtroom 7000 before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 8/3/2023) (rpiz)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gibson Sinclair Wright on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Wright, Gibson) |
| Case Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell. (jenjones, ) |
| Initial Pretrial Conference held on 8/3/2023 before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (rpiz) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER with Attachment #1 Pretrial Schedule A - Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/3/2023 at 9:45 AM before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Order issued by deputy clerk at the direction of the Court) (rpiz)
|
| Filing 6 AGREED ORDER OF PROTECTION. It appearing to the Court that the Plaintiff and Defendant Walmart are in agreement that the Defendant possesses documents that contain confidential and/or proprietary information that may be subject to discovery in the proceedings in this matter but which should not be made available to the public generally. See Order for details. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 6/27/2023. (sbea) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 Consent MOTION for Protective Order filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Protective Order by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moore, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Citizenship Disclosure Form (Local Rule 7.1) by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8972060), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint with discovery, #2 Exhibit Answer, #3 Exhibit Agreed Order from state court, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Joseph). Clerk replaced Notice of Removal to include Civil Action number on 6/8/2023. Modified on 6/8/2023. (sbea) |
| Notice of Correction re: #1 Notice of Removal; Clerk changed the "Cause" from Diversity to "Notice of Removal - Personal Injury", the Demand Amount was corrected (too many 0s) and the Civil Case Number was added to the Notice of Removal. No further action is required at this time. (sbea) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (sbea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
