Schettino v. Waters Corporation
| Dundee Schettino |
| Waters Corporation |
| 3:2023cv00478 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Upon due consideration and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the deadline for the briefing on the issue of the amount in controversy be generally continued until receipt of the stipulation of dismissal. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/1/2023. (Kat)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Dundee Schettino (McDonald, Christopher) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER The Court ORDERS briefing on the amount-in-controversy. The Parties SHALL FILE a response no later than September 1, 2023. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/18/2023. (Kat)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Rule 7(E) of the Local Civil Rules for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia shall not apply to this action. Any party desiring a hearing on a dispositive motion shall file a motion requesting a hearing when the motion is filed. The Court will determine whether a hearing is necessary.Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/7/2023. (Kat)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Waters Corporation. (Remy, John) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint by Waters Corporation.(Remy, John) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER- This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Defendant Waters Corporation did not submit a Local Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement with its filing. The Court ORDERS Waters to file the Disclosure Statement no later than August 9, 2023. The Court cannot consider any filing without first establishing jurisdiction, and the Court will not presume jurisdiction until citizenship of all parties is established on the record. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/3/2023. (adun, )
|
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9049111.), filed by Waters Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Remy, John) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/28/2023: #5 State Court Complaint) (Kat, ). |
| Case Assigned to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (Kat) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schettino v. Waters Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dundee Schettino | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Wallace McDonald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Waters Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Alyssa Testo |
| Represented By: | John Michael Remy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
