Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
| Meagan R Brown |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Superstore |
| 3:2023cv00530 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that counsel shall confer with their respective clients and with each other to determine whether all parties will consent to assignment of the case to a Magistrate Judge as the presiding judicial officer. Counsel for the defendant shall ensure that the foregoing conferences occur not later than OCTOBER 10, 2023, and that the Court is informed not later than 5:00 p.m. on October 10, 2023, whether such consents (by all parties) have been given. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/18/2023. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/18/2023. (jpow, )
|
|
Set Hearings: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2023 at 12:00 PM in Richmond Courtroom 6100 before District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Rule 7(E) of the Local Civil Rules for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia shall not apply to this action. Any party desiring a hearing on a dispositive motion shall file a motion requesting a hearing when the motion is filed. The Court will determine whether a hearing is necessary. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/22/2023. (jenjones, )
|
|
Filing 3
Citizenship Disclosure Form (Local Rule 7.1) by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 2
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Moore, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9084412.), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Demurrer, #3 Exhibit Answer, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Joseph) (Main Document 1 replaced to include civil case number on 8/18/2023) (jenjones, ).
|
|
Case Assigned to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jenjones, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Meagan R Brown | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Michael Konvicka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Superstore | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Michael Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
