Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund v. PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc.
Plaintiff: Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund
Defendant: PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc. and PowerTec Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv00544
Filed: August 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John A Gibney
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Funds
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2023 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT re #6 Amended Complaint Served on PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Hanna, Mark)
October 17, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund PowerTec Inc. served on 10/12/2023, answer due 11/2/2023 (Hanna, Mark)
October 3, 2023 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to PowerTec Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Please remove the headers and print two duplex copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention. Electronically file the summons return using the filing events Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. Please ensure that the original summons page signed by the clerk is the first document to appear when filing the return of service.(adun, )
October 3, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc. served on 8/29/2023, answer due 9/19/2023 (Hanna, Mark)
October 3, 2023 Filing 7 Proposed Summons re #6 Amended Complaint by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Hanna, Mark)
October 2, 2023 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against PowerTec Inc., filed by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons on Amended Complaint)(Hanna, Mark) (Main Document 6 replaced on 10/3/2023) (adun, ).
September 7, 2023 Notice of Correction re #5 Affidavit of Service: The "Summons Returned Executed" event was incorrectly filed as "Affidavit of Service." Please refile the document using the correct docket event - Summons Returned Executed found under Initial Pleadings and Service > Service of Process. When refiling your document, please ensure that the original summons page signed by the clerk is the first page to appear followed by any pages regarding proof of services. (jsmi, )
September 6, 2023 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Notice of Electronic Filing of Initial Case Assignment, and Complaint for Enforcement of Plan Terms and Unpaid Benefit Fund Contributions served on Karen Murchison on 08/29/2023, filed by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Hanna, Mark)
August 25, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Please remove the headers and print two duplex copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention. Electronically file the summons return using the filing events Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. Please ensure that the original summons page signed by the clerk is the first document to appear when filing the return of service. (adun, )
August 25, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Hanna, Mark) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/25/2023) (adun, ).
August 25, 2023 Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Hanna, Mark)
August 25, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9095043.), filed by Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanna, Mark) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/25/2023) (adun, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/25/2023) (adun, ).
August 25, 2023 Notice of Correction re #3 : Clerk notified filing attorney that the submitted proposed summons are not able to be issued without a proper agent who can accept service on the Defendant's behalf and directed them to email a corrected version. Filing attorney was also reminded not to upload fillable forms. (adun, )
August 25, 2023 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (adun, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund v. PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Local 666 Benefit Trust Fund
Represented By: Mark Hanna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PowerTec Electrical Contractor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PowerTec Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?