Saffore v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
| Banita Brandise Saffore |
| Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States Department Of Justice, M. Dzubak, T Sliroza and H. Ray |
| 3:2023cv00558 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| David J Novak |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE It is ordered and adjudged that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDCIE for lack of jurisdiction. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Respondents. Signed by Clerk on 9/22/2023. (Kat) (Copy mailed to Petitioner along with Memorandum Opinion and Order.)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER (Dismissing 2241 Petition) It is ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 9/22/2023. (Kat) (Copy mailed to Petitioner, as directed.)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 9/22/2023. (Kat)
|
|
Filing 2
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 300002269 (Kat)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Banita Brandise Saffore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kat)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
