Morton v. DeJoy
| Russell Morton, Jr. |
| Postmaster General Louis DeJoy and Louis DeJoy |
| 3:2023cv00620 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Roderick C Young |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Roseboro Notice by Louis DeJoy (Lucier, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Louis DeJoy. (Lucier, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Louis DeJoy. (Lucier, Jonathan) |
Filing 3
ORDER- The Motion to Extend Time #2 is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that, on or before October 26, 2023, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ( #1 -1). Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 10/5/2023. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
| Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings by Louis DeJoy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lucier, Jonathan) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Roderick C. Young. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal , filed by Louis DeJoy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (State Court Documents), #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Lucier, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
