Patterson et al v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
Mallory Patterson, Emily Comer and Carla McDowney |
Virginia Department Of Corrections and Chadwick Dotson |
3:2023cv00757 |
November 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
David J Novak |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chadwick Dotson, Virginia Department Of Corrections, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplex copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention. Please electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Kat, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Emily Comer, Carla McDowney, Mallory Patterson. (Falabella, Paul) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-9212494.), filed by Mallory Patterson, Carla McDowney, Emily Comer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Falabella, Paul) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge David J. Novak. (Kat) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.