Whirlpool Corporation v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
Whirlpool Corporation |
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. |
3:2023cv00802 |
November 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER. This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Rule 7(E) of the Local Civil Rules for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia shall not apply to this action. Any party desiring a hearing on a dispositive motion shall file a motion requesting a hearing when the motion is filed. The Court will determine whether a hearing is necessary. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/22/2023. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Charles Riopelle on behalf of Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (Riopelle, Brian) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/7/2023) (Sbea, ). |
Notice of Correction re: #4 Notice of Appearance; the Notice of Appearance was not properly saved as a PDF fillable form. In the future, to correctly save the PDF fillable form, click on the File menu, select Print, and then select our PDF writer from the Printer Name List, then click on Print or OK depending on your program. Clerk has properly saved and replaced the Notice of Appearance. No further action is required. (sbea) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Whirlpool Corporation. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. waiver sent on 11/30/2023, answer due 1/29/2024. (Noona, Stephen) |
Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint and #2 Financial Disclosure Statement: Clerk replaced the Complaint and Financial Disclosure to include the Civil Action Number. Clerk also changed "Exhibit 3 to "Civil Cover Sheet". Attorney is also requested to submit the "Proposed Summons". (sbea) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (sbea) |
Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Whirlpool Corporation (Noona, Stephen). Clerk replaced Financial Disclosure to include Civil Action Number on 11/27/2023. Modified on 11/27/2023. (sbea) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief, (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-9233543), filed by Whirlpool Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Noona, Stephen). Complaint was replaced to include Civil Action Number and Exhibit 3 was relabeled Civil Cover Sheet on 11/27/202. (sbea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Whirlpool Corporation v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Whirlpool Corporation | |
Represented By: | Stephen Edward Noona |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian Charles Riopelle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.