Strege v. National Nuclear Security Administration et al
| Adam Strege |
| National Nuclear Security Administration, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Uranium One, Energy Fuels, DOE Jill Hruby, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Lab, Sandia National Laboratories, Richard Leib, Liquid Enviromental Solutions, McDonalds Hamburgers, James F. Caldwell, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Steven Gordon, Minnesota State Univeristy Mankato, Experian, University Miami Donald B. Williams, Liquid Environmental Solutions and Minnesota State University Mankato |
| 3:2023cv00803 |
| November 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Roderick C Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER- The Court DENIES the present Motion to Dismiss #10 as MOOT. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to docket any future filings received from Plaintiff as received only, given the closed nature of the case. Plaintiff is further reminded that this case is CLOSED. The Court will take no further action on any filings received after this date. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 1/4/2024. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss by Adam Strege. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 9
Copy of mandamus documents for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from Adam Strege. (Proof of service directed the copies to the District Court) (adun, )
|
|
Filing 8
Response re Order #2 filed by Adam Strege. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE- because Plaintiff failed to set forth the factual basis for any putative claims, failed to clearly state the specific claims he intends to assert against each specific defendant, and failed to articulate thebasis for venue in this Court, among other deficiencies. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants, National Nuclear Security Administration, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Uranium One, Energy Fuels, DOE Jill Hruby, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Lab, Sandia National Laboratories, Richard Leib, Liquid Environmental Solutions, McDonalds Hamburgers, James F. Caldwell, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Steven Gordon, Minnesota State University Mankato, Experian, and University Miami Donald B. Williams. Signed by Clerk on 12/20/2023. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff)(adun, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER- The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to set forth the factual basis for any putative claims, failed to clearly state the specific claims he intends to assert against each specific defendant, and failed to articulate the basis for venue in this Court, among other deficiencies. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a final appealable Judgment in a Civil Case in favor of Defendants as a separate entry on the docket. The Court does not grant leave to amend, rendering this order final and appealable. Should Plaintiff desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within 30 days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 12/20/2023. Copy of Opinion and Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 12/20/2023. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT filed by Adam Strege.(adun, )
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against James F. Caldwell, DOE Jill Hruby, Energy Fuels, Experian, Steven Gordon, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Richard Leib, Liquid Environmental Solutions, Los Alamos National Lab, McDonalds Hamburgers, Minnesota State University Mankato, National Nuclear Security Administration, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, University Miami Donald B. Williams, Uranium One, filed by Adam Strege.(adun, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- Plaintiff's IFP Motion, ECF No. #1 , is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. However, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Complaint suffers from defects that must be addressed before this action may proceed. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed by filing an Amended Complaint within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order to Show Cause. Plaintiff is ADVISED that the Amended Complaint will supersede his initial Complaint and will become the operative complaint in this action. Plaintiff is FURTHER ADVISED that this action may be dismissed if he fails to comply with the terms of this Order to Show Cause. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 12/6/2023. Copy of Order mailed to Plaintiff. (adun, )
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Adam Strege. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (Recd), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Motion, #5 Envelope)(adun, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
