Smith v. Unknown
| Antwan Smith |
| Unknown |
| 3:2024cv00087 |
| February 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Mark R Colombell |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees and in forma pauperis affidavit and did not pay the statutory filing fee. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant, Unknown. Signed by Clerk on 3/22/2024. Copy of Judgment mailed to Plaintiff.(jpow, )
|
|
Filing 5
FINAL ORDER - In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form and in forma pauperis affidavit and did not pay the statutory filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a final appealable Judgment in a Civil Case in favor of Defendant as a separate entry on the docket. Should Plaintiff desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/22/2024. Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Order mailed to Plaintiff.(jpow, )
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/22/2024. (jpow, )
|
|
Filing 3
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Antwan Smith. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action) - It is ORDERED that: this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiffs trust fund account for 6-month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff must affirm his intention to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Colombell on 2/14/2024. (Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff with IFP Form and Consent to Collection of Fees. Inmate Account Form and copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff's Institution.) (smej, )
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Unknown, filed by Antwan Smith. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(adun, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Unknown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antwan Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
