Potter v. Navy Federal Credit Union
| Carl Potter |
| Navy Federal Credit Union |
| 3:2024cv00128 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER - The Complaint offends Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, which requires a short and plain statement of this Court's jurisdiction and Mr. Potter's claims for relief. It is ORDERED that, no later than April 17, 2024, Mr. Potter SHALL file an Amended Complaint which outlines in simple and straightforward terms why he thinks he is entitled to relief and why the Court has jurisdiction over his case. Mr. Potter is ADVISED that the failure to strictly comply with the Court's directives and with applicable rules will result in DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Mr. Potter is ADVISED that as long as he continues to proceed pro se in this matter, he must provide an accompanying certification for all future filings in this case. Navy Federal Credit Union's Motion for a More Definite Statement, (ECF No. #4 ), is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/21/2024. Copy of Order and Ghostwriting Form mailed to Mr. Potter at his address of record as directed. (jpow, )
|
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Gettings, David) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Gettings, David) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER - This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Rule 7(E) of the Local Civil Rules for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia shall not apply to this action. Any party desiring a hearing on a dispositive motion shall file a motion requesting a hearing when the motion is filed. The Court will determine whether a hearing is necessary. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 3/1/2024. Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff as directed. (jpow, )
|
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Gettings, David) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9384491.), filed by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gettings, David) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Potter v. Navy Federal Credit Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl Potter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union | |
| Represented By: | David Michael Gettings |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Raul Jimenez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
