Roe v. Fowlkes Tucker, et al.
| Jane Roe |
| Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker and Nkemdilim Okoli |
| 3:2024cv00145 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Roderick C Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Memorandum in Support re #19 MOTION to File Under Pseudonym filed by Jane Roe. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 19 PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM INTRODUCTION filed by Jane Roe. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) Modified docket event and docket text on 4/9/2024 (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 18 Opposition to #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Insufficient Process, #17 Memorandum in Support filed by Jane Roe. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 17 Memorandum in Support re #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Insufficient Process filed by Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker. (O'Shea, Margaret) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Insufficient Process by Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker. (O'Shea, Margaret) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Hoehl O'Shea on behalf of Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker (O'Shea, Margaret) |
Filing 14
ORDER - This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (ECF No. #3 ). Plaintiff seeks to seal Exhibits 1-4 to the Complaint (ECF Nos. #8 , #9 , #10 , and #11 ) to protect certain personal identifying information from disclosure. In order to still provide the public with sufficient access to this case, Plaintiff concurrently filed redacted versions of those exhibits (ECF Nos. 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, and 1-4) which "redact only the necessary information sought to be protected," i.e., her name, date of birth, and other personal identifying information. Plaintiff also provided notice to the public of her intent to file these exhibits under seal, and the Court has received no objection to such request. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (ECF No. #3 ) is hereby GRANTED. Exhibits 1-4 to the Complaint (ECF Nos. #8 , #9 , #10 , and #11 ) shall remain under seal as presently filed until further order of the Court. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 3/18/24. (juljon)
|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Roe Nkemdilim Okoli served on 3/5/2024, answer due 3/26/2024 (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Roe Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker served on 3/5/2024, answer due 3/26/2024 (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 11 Sealed Attachment/Exhibit(s) 4 re #7 Memorandum in Support, #3 MOTION to Seal Complaint Exhibits 1-4. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 10 Sealed Attachment/Exhibit(s) 3 re #7 Memorandum in Support, #3 MOTION to Seal Complaint Exhibits 1-4. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 9 Sealed Attachment/Exhibit(s) 2 re #7 Memorandum in Support, #3 MOTION to Seal Complaint Exhibits 1-4. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 8 Sealed Attachment/Exhibit(s) 1 re #7 Memorandum in Support, #3 MOTION to Seal Complaint Exhibits 1-4. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Seal Complaint Exhibits 1-4 filed by Jane Roe. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker and Nkemdilim Okoli. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (jsmi, ) |
| Case reassigned to District Judge Roderick C. Young per Civil Case Cover Sheet that previously omitted related case information. District Judge M. Hannah Lauck no longer assigned to the case. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint to Okoli by Jane Roe. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint to Fowlkes by Jane Roe. (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) (Main Document 4 replaced on 2/29/2024) (jsmi, ). |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Seal Complaint Exhibits 1-4 by Jane Roe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Under Seal Filing LCvR5 (B) by Jane Roe re #1 Complaint Exhibits 1-4 (Airington-Fisher, Miriam) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9389970.), filed by Jane Roe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Airington-Fisher, Miriam) (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/29/2024 with non-fillable PDF.) (jsmi, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/1/2024 with cover sheet that includes related case.) (jsmi, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint and #4 Proposed Summons. Filing attorney reminded a Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Seal should also be filed along with the exhibits they wish to be sealed. For procedures on filing sealed documents refer to the Electronic Filing of Sealed Documents in Civil Cases which is in Chapter 8 of the E-Filing Policies and Procedures Manual. Also, Clerk replaced fillable PDF of civil cover sheet and proposed summons with non-fillable forms. (jsmi, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
