Firestone Financial, LLC v. Putt Putt Golf Courses of Richmond, Inc. et al
| Firestone Financial, LLC |
| Putt Putt Golf Courses of Richmond, Inc. and Gary Claude Hinshaw |
| 3:2024cv00177 |
| March 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Roderick C Young |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, (Putt Putt Golf Courses of Richmond, Inc.) by Firestone Financial, LLC. (Canter, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, (Gary Claude Hinshaw) by Firestone Financial, LLC. (Canter, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Firestone Financial, LLC. (Canter, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9407739.), filed by Firestone Financial, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Canter, Ronald) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/11/2024) (jsmi, ). |
| Notice of Correction: Filing attorney is instructed to file the proposed summons (in non-fillable format) to serve the defendants, or if waiving service, to notify the court in writing by electronically filing the notice. (jsmi, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Roderick C. Young. (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
