Rahman v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Zoha Rahman |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, TransUnion, LLC, American Express Company and Ally Financial Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00253 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons (Ally Financial Inc.) by Zoha Rahman. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons (American Express Company) by Zoha Rahman. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons (Transunion, LLC) by Zoha Rahman. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons (Equifax Information Services, LLC) by Zoha Rahman. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons (Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) by Zoha Rahman. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9463601.), filed by Zoha Rahman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Stein, Aryeh) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/10/2024) (adun, ). |
| Notice of Correction: Attorney reminded to put the civil action number on all documents before filing. No further action needed. (adun, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (adun, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
