Gordon v. Aimco, Inc. et al
| Andre Gordon |
| Aimco, Inc., Aimco/Bethesda Holdings, Inc., Newport-Oxford Associates, L.P., OPM Management, LLC and Pete's Auto Service of Denbigh, Inc. |
| 4:2008cv00124 |
| December 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Newport News Office |
| Newport News City |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| F. Bradford Stillman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 50 U.S.C. ยง 0501 Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
OPINION AND ORDER that the 105 Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to the previously reserved issue of the Plaintiff's entitlement to an attorney's fee award in this case; The 68 Plaintiff's motion f or summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to the previously reserved issue of the Plaintiff's entitlement to an attorney's fee award in this case; directing the Clerk to enter judgment for the Plaintiff with respect to the Defendant' s liability under Count III of the complaint, which asserts a common-law claim for conversion; directing the Clerk to enter judgment for the Plaintiff with respect to the Defendant's liability for reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the Plaintiff in connection with Count IV of the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman and filed on 3/12/2012. (rsim)
|
|
Filing
128
OPINION and ORDER directing that the Court RESERVES ruling with respect to the availability of an attorney's fee award. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 105) is DENIED except with respect to the availability of an attorney&# 039;s fee award. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is GRANTED with respect to the defendant's liability for violation of Section 307(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and otherwise DENIED, except with respect to the availability of an attorney's fee award. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for the plaintiff with respect to the defendant's liability under Count IV of the complaint, which allege s a violation of Section 307(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. A determination as to any monetary damages shall be reserved for jury trial. The parties are ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why summary judgment should not be granted to the plaintiff wit h respect to the defendant's liability under Count III of the complaint, which asserts a common-law claim for conversion. The parties may submit written briefs with respect to this issue, not to exceed ten pages, within 7 days of date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman and filed on 12/2/11. (mwin, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
