United States ex rel. Tamika Nottingham, et al v. Delores Freeman Thomas, et al
| UNITED STATES, Commonwealth of Virginia and Tamika Nottingham |
| New Season Clinical Services, LLC, Delores Freeman Thomas and Jane Does #1-99 |
| UNITED STATES |
| Commonwealth of Virginia |
| 4:2011cv00099 |
| June 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Newport News Office |
| Norfolk City |
| Robert G. Doumar |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER entered and filed 11/20/15 ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 57 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Joint 45 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART against Thomas and New Season. Plaintiffs are AWARDED damages in the amount of $1,505,173.00. trebled, totaling $4,515,519.00. Additionally, the unnamed Jane Does numbers 1-99 are hereby DISMISSED. The matter of civil penalties is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT until such time that Plaintiffs request a hearing as directed by the Magistrate Judge. In light of these orders, Plaintiff's Joint 44 Motion for Default Judgment against only the Defendant New Season is hereby DENIED as the judgment sought against New Season is addressed by the ruling on the Joint Motion for Summary Judgment. (Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 11/20/15). Copies provided 11/20/15. (ecav, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
