Trussell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District Trussell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trussell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Carrie S. Trussell
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	4:2013cv00047
Filed:	April 18, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Newport News Office
County:	Hampton City
Presiding Judge:	Tommy E. Miller
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2014	Filing 16 FINAL ORDER GRANTING re 10 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendations and 15 Amended Report and Recommendations. The court does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed December 12, 2013, and the amended report filed December 13, 2013. Accordingly, defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and the case is her eby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED, to the extent the statute of limitations prevents her from re-filing this action, her dilatory conduct may have effectively rendered this dismissal as one with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk shall enter judgment for the defendant. (See Order fro specifics) Copies distributed as directed to Pro Se Plaintiff and Counsel as directed on 01/07/2014. (Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 1/7/2014). (bgra)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2014

Filing 16 FINAL ORDER GRANTING re 10 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendations and 15 Amended Report and Recommendations. The court does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the report of the United States Magistrate Judge filed December 12, 2013, and the amended report filed December 13, 2013. Accordingly, defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and the case is her eby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is NOTIFIED, to the extent the statute of limitations prevents her from re-filing this action, her dilatory conduct may have effectively rendered this dismissal as one with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk shall enter judgment for the defendant. (See Order fro specifics) Copies distributed as directed to Pro Se Plaintiff and Counsel as directed on 01/07/2014. (Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 1/7/2014). (bgra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trussell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie S. Trussell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?