Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District The United States of America for the Use of Harbor Construction Company, Inc. v. T.H.R. Enterprises, Inc. et al

The United States of America for the Use of Harbor Construction Company, Inc. v. T.H.R. Enterprises, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	The United States of America for the Use of Harbor Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant:	T.H.R. Enterprises, Inc. and The Hanover Group Insurance Company
Case Number:	4:2014cv00017
Filed:	February 10, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Newport News Office
County:	Hampton City
Presiding Judge:	Mark S. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Tommy E. Miller
Nature of Suit:	Miller Act
Cause of Action:	40 U.S.C. § 3131
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2014	Filing 17 MEMORANDOM ORDER: granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants' motion to stay proceedings in this Court and to compel arbitration of the instant dispute is GRANTED. ECF No. 13. No ruling is issued as to the separate ly filed motion to dismiss. ECF No. 12. It is hereby ORDERED that until this case is reactivated by Court order, it shall be stricken from the active docket and no longer considered a pending case for administrative purposes. Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants are each INSTRUCTED to file a status update with this Court no later than December 31, 2014.Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 9/9/2014. (bgra)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2014

Filing 17 MEMORANDOM ORDER: granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants' motion to stay proceedings in this Court and to compel arbitration of the instant dispute is GRANTED. ECF No. 13. No ruling is issued as to the separate ly filed motion to dismiss. ECF No. 12. It is hereby ORDERED that until this case is reactivated by Court order, it shall be stricken from the active docket and no longer considered a pending case for administrative purposes. Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants are each INSTRUCTED to file a status update with this Court no later than December 31, 2014.Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 9/9/2014. (bgra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The United States of America for the Use of Harbor Construction Company, Inc. v. T.H.R. Enterprises, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: T.H.R. Enterprises, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: The Hanover Group Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use of Harbor Construction Company, Inc.
Represented By:	Philip Lee Russo, Jr.
Represented By:	Francis John Driscoll, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?