Siemens Industry, Inc. et al v. The Hanover Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Siemens Industry, Inc.
Defendant: The Hanover Insurance Company, THR Enterprises, Inc. and Tidal Mechanical, Inc.
Cross_claimant: THR Enterprises, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Tidal Mechanical, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2015cv00018
Filed: January 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Newport News Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Miller
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40 U.S.C. ยง 0270
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Granting 14 Motion for Default Judgment; Adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations. The Court hereby ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 18, 2015, and Plaintiff Siemens Industry, Inc. 's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Tidal Mechanical, Inc., ECF No. 14, is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Siemens Industry, Inc. against Tidal Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $39,985.00. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 12/11/15. Copies distributed to all parties 12/11/15. (ldab, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siemens Industry, Inc. et al v. The Hanover Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Siemens Industry, Inc.
Represented By: Deona Tenae DeClue
Represented By: Timothy Sullivan
Represented By: Deona Tenae DeClue
Represented By: Timothy Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Hanover Insurance Company
Represented By: David Allen Hearne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THR Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: David Allen Hearne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tidal Mechanical, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: THR Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: David Allen Hearne
Represented By: David Allen Hearne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: Tidal Mechanical, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?