Murry v. Johnson
| Fredrick P. Murry, Jr. |
| Jeh Johnson |
| 4:2015cv00088 |
| August 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Newport News Office |
| York |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 11/23/2015. (epri) |
Filing 11
DISMISSAL ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED. Copies of Order sent as directed on 11.23.15 Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 11/23/2015. (epri)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeh Johnson served on 9/1/2015, (epri) |
| Filing 9 Roseboro Notice as to Motion to Dismiss by Jeh Johnson (Porter, Kent) |
| Filing 8 Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Jeh Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Porter, Kent) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Jeh Johnson. (Porter, Kent) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Attorney - Jeh Johnson served on 9/2/2015. (epri) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Atty Gen for Jeh Johnson served on 8/31/2015. (epri) |
| Filing 4 Three Summonses, each with service copy, Issued as to Jeh Johnson at Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons packages delivered to USM with 285 forms and a certified copy of IFP Order for each. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures, #2 USM 285)(epri) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Jeh Johnson, filed by Fredrick P. Murry, Jr.(epri) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue summons in this action and prepare three packets containing a summons, a copy of the Complaint, and this Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to deliver these packets to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order to the Attorney General of the United States, the United States Attorney, and the Department of Homeland Security, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(2). Copy of Order sent to plaintiff and service packets delivered to US Marshal as DIRECTED on 8.20.15. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/20/2015. (epri, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fredrick P. Murry, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(epri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murry v. Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fredrick P. Murry, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jeh Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Kent Pendleton Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
